<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contest #3 - What&#8217;s In the Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/</link>
	<description>Rants and musings, without care for substance.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Technology &#38; MSG &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Too Much is Happening</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14624</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology &#38; MSG &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Too Much is Happening</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 22:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14624</guid>
		<description>[...] but DJ was selected &#8212; through a few rounds of random sequencing &#8212; as the winner of the What&#8217;s in the Case? contest. Best bets based on components and research are that the device in the case is an early [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but <abbr class="uttInitialism" title="disc jockey">DJ</abbr> was selected &#8212; through a few rounds of random sequencing &#8212; as the winner of the What&#8217;s in the Case? contest. Best bets based on components and research are that the device in the case is an early [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamra</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14437</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14437</guid>
		<description>Oh gosh what was I thinking?  I mean actually how I could have thought it held a MUSICAL instrument is beyond words.  Unbelievable.   After all you are the sound man!  Hmmm...it must be the "little black box" of sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh gosh what was I thinking?  I mean actually how I could have thought it held a MUSICAL instrument is beyond words.  Unbelievable.   After all you are the sound man!  Hmmm&#8230;it must be the &#8220;little black box&#8221; of sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamra</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14436</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14436</guid>
		<description>No no wait. Wait! It's actually a flute case.  It may have belonged to your sister.  I mean I can't believe it would actually belong to you because...well...I picture you more the trumpet player. Hmm...wait.  Not the trumpet player.  Actually a bass man.  Yes...a bass man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no wait. Wait! It&#8217;s actually a flute case.  It may have belonged to your sister.  I mean I can&#8217;t believe it would actually belong to you because&#8230;well&#8230;I picture you more the trumpet player. Hmm&#8230;wait.  Not the trumpet player.  Actually a bass man.  Yes&#8230;a bass man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamra</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14435</link>
		<dc:creator>Tamra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14435</guid>
		<description>Without looking at anything but the case I'd say it's a pool stick case.  Because after all you have so much time to play pool with all of your other activies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without looking at anything but the case I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s a pool stick case.  Because after all you have so much time to play pool with all of your other activies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mischler</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14425</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mischler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14425</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is an interesting piece of technology.

So, what do we have?  A 300 baud modem with an acoustic coupler.

Various switches and connectors labeled on the console.  They are written in both english and in old-school DYMO braille.  So the device is designed to be operated by both sighted and blind people.  But definitley adapted for use by the blind.  

Picture 5 has a switch for Operate/Test modes.  The second switch in the picture is for Ans/Orig mode.  We can guess that the device could be used for both originating calls and answering calls.

The grouping of the white keys in picture 2 confused me for a little while, but I recognize now that they could be a braille input device.  (Perkins) Braille typewriters have a 3-1-3 grouping to produce the six dots that make up a character.  The middle character is used to advance the printer head.  That doesn't explain the leftover rectangular button in picture 4, but when you look towards modern devices used for braille input, the modern Perkins-style keyboard consists of 4-1-4 key groupings.

So, lets start guessing.  The keyboard port takes what appears to be a 15 pin DSub connector.  Not particularly helpful.  Unless, of course, you were working in diagnotics, and were not trained in braille. On the other hand, the keyboard attachment could be used as an external braille device. (Refreshable braille display)

Taking a guess, I would say that the device is a relatively early Braille TTY device.  Normally, blind people can pick up the phone and call anyone.  That doesn't work if you can't speak or hear.  So, my guess is that the device is designed to be used as a communication device for someone who is both deaf and blind.

A google image search for Telesensory TeleBraille TTY showed what this device possibly evolved into.

As to the history of the device, the use of the Novation modem puts us in the late 70's/early 80's range.  &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novation_CAT" rel="nofollow"&gt;source&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is an interesting piece of technology.</p>
<p>So, what do we have?  A 300 baud modem with an acoustic coupler.</p>
<p>Various switches and connectors labeled on the console.  They are written in both english and in old-school DYMO braille.  So the device is designed to be operated by both sighted and blind people.  But definitley adapted for use by the blind.  </p>
<p>Picture 5 has a switch for Operate/Test modes.  The second switch in the picture is for Ans/Orig mode.  We can guess that the device could be used for both originating calls and answering calls.</p>
<p>The grouping of the white keys in picture 2 confused me for a little while, but I recognize now that they could be a braille input device.  (Perkins) Braille typewriters have a 3-1-3 grouping to produce the six dots that make up a character.  The middle character is used to advance the printer head.  That doesn&#8217;t explain the leftover rectangular button in picture 4, but when you look towards modern devices used for braille input, the modern Perkins-style keyboard consists of 4-1-4 key groupings.</p>
<p>So, lets start guessing.  The keyboard port takes what appears to be a 15 pin DSub connector.  Not particularly helpful.  Unless, of course, you were working in diagnotics, and were not trained in braille. On the other hand, the keyboard attachment could be used as an external braille device. (Refreshable braille display)</p>
<p>Taking a guess, I would say that the device is a relatively early Braille TTY device.  Normally, blind people can pick up the phone and call anyone.  That doesn&#8217;t work if you can&#8217;t speak or hear.  So, my guess is that the device is designed to be used as a communication device for someone who is both deaf and blind.</p>
<p>A google image search for Telesensory TeleBraille TTY showed what this device possibly evolved into.</p>
<p>As to the history of the device, the use of the Novation modem puts us in the late 70&#8217;s/early 80&#8217;s range.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novation_CAT" rel="nofollow">source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DJ</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14423</link>
		<dc:creator>DJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14423</guid>
		<description>Since there appears to be only 1 port to connect peripherals to (not counting the modem) I would guess it to be a two-way communication device for the blind.

The braille definitely is the biggest clue IMO. Image #4 appears to be where one would place their finger and the pins would come up to create a braille character. The ANS/ORIG switch determines whether the modem is in call or answer mode. The TEST/OPERATE is just that, most likely allows for the testing of the mechanical portion of the unit by echoing what characters are typed on the keyboard. UPTIME, perhaps a timeout or how long the pins "stay up" to represent the braille character. I believe the three white buttons on each left/right side of the unit represent the three pins on each side of the unit that creates a braille character.

This is my best guess at the current time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there appears to be only 1 port to connect peripherals to (not counting the modem) I would guess it to be a two-way communication device for the blind.</p>
<p>The braille definitely is the biggest clue IMO. Image #4 appears to be where one would place their finger and the pins would come up to create a braille character. The ANS/ORIG switch determines whether the modem is in call or answer mode. The TEST/OPERATE is just that, most likely allows for the testing of the mechanical portion of the unit by echoing what characters are typed on the keyboard. UPTIME, perhaps a timeout or how long the pins &#8220;stay up&#8221; to represent the braille character. I believe the three white buttons on each left/right side of the unit represent the three pins on each side of the unit that creates a braille character.</p>
<p>This is my best guess at the current time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/2008/08/28/contest-3-whats-in-the-case/#comment-14419</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moundalexis.com/tm/?p=474#comment-14419</guid>
		<description>It looks like that funky thing they used back in the day to administer hearing tests.  "Raise your hand when you hear the beep."  Um, yeah I raised my hand whenever and nobody seemed to notice I'm almost deaf in one ear.

Clearly the "device" was a pile of FAIL.  Or maybe the guy behind the device...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like that funky thing they used back in the day to administer hearing tests.  &#8220;Raise your hand when you hear the beep.&#8221;  Um, yeah I raised my hand whenever and nobody seemed to notice I&#8217;m almost deaf in one ear.</p>
<p>Clearly the &#8220;device&#8221; was a pile of FAIL.  Or maybe the guy behind the device&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
